The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has proposed drastic measures to curb Google’s dominance in the search and digital advertising market.
These proposals, considered one of the most significant antitrust actions in years, include selling the Chrome browser, separating the Android operating system, and ending preferential agreements such as those that make Google the default search engine on Apple devices.
Key Actions Proposed by the DOJ
Among the DOJ’s highlighted measures are:
- Sale of Chrome: The browser, used by over 60% of internet users, could be sold to reduce Google’s dominance in the digital ecosystem.
- Separation of Android: The Android mobile operating system, a cornerstone of Google’s business, would be split from its main operations.
- Ending Agreements with Apple: Contracts positioning Google as the default search engine on iOS devices would be terminated.
These measures aim to foster fairer competition in a market where Google has maintained significant control for over a decade.
Photo: U.S. Department of Justice headquarters, the epicenter of legal actions against Google.
A Global Shift in Big Tech Regulation
The DOJ’s proposal is part of a growing global trend to moderate the power of major tech companies. From Donald Trump’s administration to Joe Biden’s, the U.S. government has identified Google as a prime example of anti-competitive practices.
Additionally, a recent ruling in the Epic Games case against Google could force the company to make significant changes to its app store, Google Play Store, as part of broader efforts to reduce its market dominance.
Photo: Graphic representation of the antitrust case against Google.
A Historic Precedent
The current case echoes pivotal moments in U.S. antitrust history. In 1984, AT&T was broken up into seven companies to reduce its telecommunications monopoly. However, in 2000, a court order to split Microsoft was overturned by higher courts.
Judge Amit Mehta, overseeing the case against Google, is expected to issue a ruling in August 2025. Any decision, however, will likely be appealed, potentially prolonging the legal battle.
Market Impact and Criticism of Google
The innovations of companies like Google have revolutionized the global economy but have also raised concerns about their disproportionate influence. Smaller companies must adapt to Google’s algorithms to survive, limiting competition.
Google has voiced its opposition to the DOJ’s proposals, arguing that these measures would harm user experience and dismantle products essential to daily life.
Photo: Infographic detailing the antitrust case against Google.
Conclusion
The case against Google could mark a turning point in regulating major tech companies. In addition to redefining the digital market, it may set precedents for companies like Amazon, Apple, and Meta. The final resolution will determine whether Big Tech will face stricter controls in the coming years.