Who Is on RFK, Jr.’s New Vaccine Panel—And What Will They Do?
Critics fear that U.S. Department of Health and Human Services chief RFK, Jr., known for his antivaccine views, has picked a crucial CDC committee that will be a “disaster for public health”
U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. during testimony before the House Appropriations Committee on May 14, 2025 in Washington, D.C.
An emergency-room doctor, critics of COVID-19 vaccines and an obstetrician who advises a supplement company are among the advisers handpicked by vaccine sceptic Robert F. Kennedy Jr, the head of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), to provide advice on vaccines to the federal government.
Kennedy announced his new roster for the influential Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) on 11 June — just two days after he fired all 17 of its previous members and accused the ACIP of “malevolent malpractice”. The ACIP advises US public-health officials as to who should receive approved vaccines, and when. Those recommendations are then often used to guide whether public and private health-insurance programmes will pay for the shots.
Kennedy has pledged that the ACIP will re-evaluate the vaccine “schedule” for children — the list of which vaccines children should get and when they should get them. This week’s shakeup of the committee is “a major step towards restoring public trust in vaccines,” Kennedy said in a post on the social media platform, X.
If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Several of the new ACIP members have expressed public support for vaccines. But a number of them have also expressed scepticism; one serves on the board of an anti-vaccination organization, and a second has been a prominent sceptic of the COVID-19 vaccines on social media. As first reported by the biomedical news outlet STAT, Kennedy included four of the new committee members in the dedication to his 2021 book The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health.
“This is a disaster for public health,” says Adam Ratner, a paediatric infectious diseases physician in New York City. “It has the potential to set us back decades.” The HHS did not respond to a request for comment before publication.
Infectious-disease specialists worry about the implications of the ACIP potentially voting to recommend fewer vaccines or fewer doses than are currently advised. Paul Offit, an infectious-diseases paediatrician at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and co-inventor of a rotavirus vaccine who served on the ACIP from 1998 to 2003, says insurers don’t have to cover vaccines that aren’t recommended by the ACIP. And “doctors or pharmacists who give vaccines may feel that they would be liable for giving that vaccine”, he adds.
Offit notes that at the ACIP’s next meeting, which starts 25 June, the panel will decide whether to recommend vaccines for COVID-19, the human papillomavirus, meningococcal disease and RSV. “These are established vaccines, and we’re voting on them?” Offit says. “The entire childhood and adult immunisation schedule is on the table.”
Kennedy has criticized the ACIP for what he says are rampant conflicts of interest among its members. On 12 June, the biopharma news outlet Endpoints News reported that two newly named ACIP members, Robert Malone and Martin Kulldorff, have received payment for serving as expert witnesses in lawsuits against pharmaceutical company Merck over two of its vaccines. Malone said on X that this work ended six years ago.
Kennedy has also said that past committee members did not demand what he considers to be adequate safety trials with control groups that received a placebo, before recommending vaccines.
But many of the vaccine studies included placebo controls, Ratner says, unless it was unethical to conduct the trial with one. And Reingold, who has served on the ACIP in the past, says that the committee has strict policies regarding conflicts of interest and that committee members must recuse themselves from any vote that might pose a conflict. “The issue of potential conflicts of interest has been radically overblown and unfairly called into question the objectivity of this panel,” he says.
Offit says several independent groups have reviewed previous ACIP members and found no conflicts of interest. “Now, the conflict of interest is real because these folks are indebted to RFK Jr, who just gave them this position,” he says.
Researchers are also concerned about the loss of expertise. The committee’s new lineup is “disturbing”, says Nancy Bennett, a public-health specialist at the University of Rochester Medical Center in New York.
In the past, members were nominated and then vetted by staff at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) before being sent to the head of the CDC and, finally, the head of the HHS for approval. Bennett says the vetting process sometimes took years. “The ACIP was meant to be composed of people with deep expertise in the area,” Ratner says. “That’s what we have lost.”
Hibbeln is a psychiatrist and neuroscientist who once worked at the US National Institutes of Health. His recent papers have focused on the connection between nutrition and various disorders, including mental-health conditions, and his LinkedIn profile states that twenty-first-century diets are contributing to “inadequate brain nutrients and are likely contributing to the high burden of mental illnesses worldwide”. A search of PubMed, a database of biomedical papers, did not turn up any papers he has authored about vaccines or infectious disease. He did not respond to a request for comment.
Last year, Kulldorff wrote in City Journal that he was fired from Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, for refusing a COVID-19 vaccine even though he already had immunity from being infected. He also wrote that “vaccines are a vital medical invention, allowing people to obtain immunity without the risk that comes from getting sick,” but suggested that trials of COVID-19 vaccines early in the pandemic were not properly designed. Kulldorff did not respond to Nature’s request for comment.
Malone is a physician and scientist whose research contributed to the development of mRNA vaccines. He maintains that he has not received the credit he deserves for his role, but in a 2023 video, he said the mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 would damage children’s organs and had no benefit to children.
He also promoted ivermectin, an anti-parasite medication, as a treatment for COVID-19; mounting evidence shows that it has no effect. Malone declined to comment but said in an e-mailed statement that he will do his “best to serve with unbiased objectivity and rigor”.
Meissner studies paediatrics at the Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine in Lebanon, New Hampshire, and has served on multiple federal committees on vaccines. He was a member of the ACIP from 2008 to 2012. He has emphasized the importance of COVID-19 vaccines, saying in 2021 that “it’s important that the main message we transmit is that we’ve got to get everyone two doses.” In 2021, he co-authored a newspaper commentary opposing mask mandates for children, and he has expressed scepticism about the benefits of repeated COVID-19 booster shots for children. He did not respond to a request for comment.
Ross is an obstetrician and chief medical officer at Manta Pharma, an implantable device company in Maryland. He has been a board member and adviser for nearly a dozen pharmaceutical and medical-device companies, including LarreaRx, which distributes an herbal supplement. Ross was a presidential appointee on a CDC committee for preventing breast and cervical cancer, and a professor at George Washington University for 46 years. His LinkedIn profile lists his specialties as “Contact lenses, International Business, Healthcare and pharmaceutical executive management, pharmaceutical consulting.” He did not respond to a request for comment.
This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on June 12, 2025.
Heidi Ledford works for Nature magazine.
Rachel Fieldhouse is a reporter for Nature News.
First published in 1869, Nature is the world’s leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.
Source: www.scientificamerican.com